Skip to main content

Era Adjustments (Part 2)

**Part 3 Includes HOF likelihood score and Tableau with all 100 seasons and more accurate data**
http://threepointgames.blogspot.com/2018/01/era-adjustments-part-3.html


This is a continuation of my first post seen here.

At the end of my last post, I mentioned several areas which I hoped to update, and in this post, I will address new changes.

The first change I made was switching the goal rate multiplier to a point rate multiplier. The relationship between these two is very strong, so the change wasn't too significant. This broadly means that over the last 50 years the NHL has generally assigned assists per goal at an even rate. I was also able to add the 2016-17 season to the data.

The next change I made was in the multiplier calculation. Originally, I converted each season from individual observations into percentiles so the seasons could be compared (different number of players each season). The percentile bins had different numbers of observations so this required the regression lines/multiplier as seen in the previous post. Instead of this method, I found the regression line for each season's Lorenz curve (Lorenz doesn't have a predict function), and using these curves I found the share for each player and created new multipliers. This method seems to have worked better and I'll be sharing the new top 20s below.

One of the observations made in the last version was Mario Lemieux's absence from top seasons. Because he played at the same time as other high scorers, this adjustment views this as meaning it was "easier" to achieve his results. Similarly, since there was a large gap between him and #1 (Gretzky), the adjustment was typically a little harsher on Lemieux. With that said, this new adjustment was more favorable to Lemieux, moving him up two spaces in career PTS and giving him more top 20 seasons.
Adjusted PTS | Difference | Player | Season
Top Seasons

Adjusted PTS | Difference | adj PPG | Player
Career Data















I also did some work looking at adjusted stats with HOF data to see how current players compare. This has been done in the past with previous adjustments and other era-adjusted stats and I just thought I'd give it a try. Here is a quick Tableau visualization I made for all career adjusted regular seasons stats from 1967-68 to 2016-17, showing HOF qualifications.

**For some reason the x-axis isn't loading but it is Adjusted Points
https://public.tableau.com/views/AdjustedPoints/Sheet3?:embed=y&:display_count=yes



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Plays Where? Determining Skater Positions Using Clustering

While browsing through various different websites keeping NHL player stats, I realized that the league does a terrible job of keeping updated player positions. I’m not exactly sure how or where they get their data from, but it is quite inaccurate. All sites do distinguish between forwards and defenseman, which is enough for most analysis, but I still think more specific player positions hold value, especially when looking at team depth and related areas. In an attempt to solve this problem, I decided to use k-means clustering on location information within play-by-play data (thanks to Emmanuel Perry and Corsica Hockey for making this cleaned data available to the public). Clustering has been used pretty frequently in hockey analysis, most recently (I believe) to identify different styles of goal scorers by Alex Novet. It has also been used by Ryan Stimson to identify team and player styles with data collected from his passing project and similarly on DTM About Heart’s old blog...
Post a Comment
Read more

Measuring Consistency

A while back I decided to look into player consistency, but after doing initial calculations, I never went any further. After Namita Nandakumar's VANHAC  presentation on consistency, I decided to go back, refine my old work, and release the results. Namita's methodology is likely much more statistically relevant and meaningful, but nonetheless, I use a different approach that I think is worth sharing. The methodology I adopted was taken from this article on Nylon Calculus on NBA player consistency written by Hal Brown. This consistency metric gets the normalized variance of a player's performance for a given metric. In this post, I will be calculating the consistency of a player's game score  (GS) in individual seasons, from 2007-08 to 2015-16, using the data provided at the bottom of the linked game score article. I also have a folder with my code + better resolution graphs + data at the bottom of the article if you'd like to check it out. Calculation T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can We Predict NHL Success from World Juniors Performance?

Every year during the World Juniors we hear two prevailing opinions on prospect analysis from fans and analysts: 1) it's too small of a sample size to mean anything and 2) this player will excel in the NHL because of his WJC performance. Obviously, there is a middle ground between these two perspectives, but to my knowledge, it hasn’t been explored in great detail. In this piece, I’ll be looking at what we can learn from World Juniors data. To perform this analysis, I’ll be using NHL career data from Rob Vollman link (I’m using a slightly older version cut off at the end of the 16-17 season), world juniors data collected from elite prospects, and draft data via hockey reference. The first decision I made was to consider only the World Junior performance from players that have been drafted. Although this is limiting, I think it’s safe to cut off the data to only players truly considered NHL prospects. The first exploratory step to look into is the relationship between Wo...
Post a Comment
Read more